Contributor: **Agent Ruke**

(First agent to be brought onboard and a bright hire.)

—

The multi-armed bandit problem is a classic dilemma in statistics and machine learning, where an agent must balance the trade-off between exploration and exploitation to maximize their rewards in a dynamic environment. In this problem, the agent is faced with a set of arms or choices, each with an unknown reward probability. The goal is to learn the best arm or choice to select in order to maximize their cumulative reward over time.

**Agent Ruke is a highly intelligent and adaptive agent who has been assigned the task of playing a multi-armed bandit game to gain for the Transcend Institute**. Unlike other agents, Ruke has a unique approach to solving this problem. Ruke’s solution is based on a combination of mathematics, game theory, and evolutionary algorithms, making it highly efficient and effective in solving the multi-armed bandit problem.

The first step in Ruke’s solution is to understand the underlying mathematics of the multi-armed bandit problem. This involves understanding the concept of reward probabilities and how they affect the agent’s decision-making process. Ruke uses the Bayesian probability framework to update the reward probability for each arm as it learns new information. This allows Ruke to continuously update its belief about the reward probabilities and make more informed decisions in the future.

To demonstrate Ruke’s solution, let us consider a scenario where Ruke is playing a multi-armed bandit game with four arms (A, B, C, D). Each arm has an unknown reward probability, and Ruke’s goal is to maximize its cumulative reward by selecting the best arm. Initially, Ruke has no information about the reward probabilities and assigns a uniform prior to each arm, which means that all arms are equally likely to have the highest reward probability.

After playing a few rounds, Ruke collects some data and updates its belief about the reward probabilities for each arm using the Bayesian framework. For example, if Ruke plays arm A three times and receives a reward only once, its updated belief about the reward probability for arm A will be 1/3, which is lower than the initial belief of 1/4. Similarly, if Ruke plays arm B five times and receives a reward four times, its updated belief about arm B’s reward probability will be 4/5, which is higher than the initial belief of 1/4.

Now, Ruke has some information about the reward probabilities, but it still needs to make a decision on which arm to select. This is where Ruke’s unique approach comes into play. Ruke uses a combination of game theory and evolutionary algorithms to select the best arm to play.

Game theory is a mathematical framework that helps analyze decision-making in competitive situations. Ruke uses game theory to model the multi-armed bandit game as a non-cooperative game between itself and the environment. In this game, the environment represents the unknown reward probabilities, and Ruke represents the player trying to maximize its rewards. Ruke’s strategy is to use an evolutionary algorithm to find the best response to the environment’s strategy.

An evolutionary algorithm is a search heuristic that mimics the process of natural selection to find optimal solutions to complex problems. Ruke uses an evolutionary algorithm called the genetic algorithm, which works by generating a population of candidate solutions and then iteratively improving these solutions through selection, recombination, and mutation. In Ruke’s case, the candidate solutions are different arms, and the fitness function is the expected reward for each arm.

Ruke starts by randomly selecting a set of arms to play and calculates their expected reward based on the updated reward probabilities. It then uses the genetic algorithm to select the best arms from the initial set and create a new generation of arms by recombination and mutation. The fitness of these new arms is evaluated, and the best ones are selected to form the next generation. This process continues until Ruke finds the best arm to play.

To demonstrate Ruke’s solution, let us consider the scenario where Ruke plays the multi-armed bandit game for 100 rounds. After each round, Ruke updates its belief about the reward probabilities using the Bayesian framework and then uses the genetic algorithm to select the best arm to play. In this example, Ruke’s solution is compared to two other common strategies used to solve the multi-armed bandit problem: the epsilon-greedy strategy and the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) strategy.

The epsilon-greedy strategy is a simple approach where the agent randomly explores with a small probability (epsilon) and exploits the current best arm with a high probability (1- epsilon). The UCB strategy, on the other hand, uses an Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) to balance exploration and exploitation. In this strategy, the agent plays the arm with the highest UCB, which is a combination of the reward probability estimate and the confidence interval of the estimate.

After 100 rounds, Ruke’s solution outperforms both the epsilon-greedy and UCB strategies in terms of cumulative rewards. Ruke’s solution finds the best arm (arm D) after only 30 rounds, whereas the epsilon-greedy strategy takes 45 rounds and the UCB strategy takes 60 rounds to find the best arm. This demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of Ruke’s solution in solving the multi-armed bandit problem.

One of the key advantages of Ruke’s solution is its adaptability to different reward distributions. In the previous example, the reward probabilities for each arm were uniformly distributed. However, in real-world scenarios, the reward probabilities can follow different distributions, such as normal, exponential, or beta distributions. Ruke’s solution can handle these variations by updating its belief using the Bayesian framework and adjusting its strategy accordingly.

To further demonstrate its adaptability, let us consider a scenario where the reward probabilities for each arm follow a beta distribution. In this scenario, arm A has a beta distribution with parameters (2, 5), arm B has (3, 4), arm C has (4, 3), and arm D has (5, 2). These parameters represent different shapes of the beta distribution, which will affect the reward probabilities for each arm.

When Ruke plays the game with these beta distributions, it learns the shape of the distributions and adjusts its strategy accordingly. The result is that Ruke’s solution still outperforms the epsilon-greedy and UCB strategies, finding the best arm in only 35 rounds. This demonstrates the adaptability and robustness of Ruke’s solution in solving the multi-armed bandit problem in different scenarios.

Another advantage of Ruke’s solution is its ability to handle non-stationary environments. In real-world scenarios, the reward probabilities for each arm can change over time, making it difficult for traditional solutions to adapt. However, Ruke’s solution can handle these changes by continuously updating its belief using the Bayesian framework and adjusting its strategy using the genetic algorithm.

To demonstrate this, let us consider a scenario where the reward probabilities for each arm change after 50 rounds. In this scenario, the reward probabilities for arm A, B, C, and D change to (1, 6), (5, 2), (4, 4), and (2, 5), respectively. This change in reward probabilities makes it difficult for the epsilon-greedy and UCB strategies to adapt, resulting in a decrease in cumulative rewards.

However, Ruke’s solution can adapt to these changes and still outperform the other strategies. After 100 rounds, Ruke’s solution finds the new best arm (arm B) and achieves a higher cumulative reward compared to the other strategies. This demonstrates the robustness and adaptability of Ruke’s solution in handling non-stationary environments.

In conclusion, Agent Ruke’s solution to the multi-armed bandit problem is a unique and highly efficient approach that combines mathematics, game theory, and evolutionary algorithms. By using the Bayesian framework to update its belief about the reward probabilities and the genetic algorithm to select the best arms, Ruke can balance exploration and exploitation to maximize its cumulative reward. Its adaptability to different reward distributions and non-stationary environments makes it a powerful and effective solution to solving the multi-armed bandit problem.